Newton's Law by Saint Kanada - Debunking Final conclusion

If the fraud  is not oblivious by now I will quote the full translation of the sukta (From Vol 6 The sacred book of the Hindus “The vaisheshika sutra of kanada - commentary by sankara misra“)

1) DRAVYASHRAYYAGUNAVAAN SAMYOGA VIBHAAGESHU AKAARANAM ITHI GUNA LAKSHANAM [ VAISHESHIKA SUTHRA 1.1.16]

Commentary is as below

 

2)

SAMYOGA VIBHAAGA VEGHAANAAM KARMA SAMAANAM.      [ VAISHESHIKA SUTRA -- 1.1.20]

 

 

Who on the earth found out newton’s laws of motion here. I think it is self explanatory that these things have nothing to do with Newton’s laws of motion or anything similar to that. Off course I am not saying entire vaisheshika philosophy is useless. Kanada’s thoughts as a philosophical speculation were more naturalistic and advanced compared to other philosophies of that time. But to compare it to Newton’s law is absurdity. It is a clear case of trying to equate philosophical speculation and scientific theories. Kanada was prominent philosopher in the vaisheshika school of indian philosophy.  He vews on

atomism was similar(if not more advanced) to greek philosopher Democritus but important thing to note is that it was philosophical speculation not scientific analysis.He wasn't using scientific method. One thing that distinguishes science is that empirical testing of the ideas. To give a similar example many Ionian coast philosophers in greek also speculated on many physical theories but it is laughable to say that newton and other physicists just rediscovered what Ionian coast philosophers had said